In a group/team like human resources compensation, as I understand from listening on the sideline, each person in the group manages a certain part of the company. Her new boss is a fantastic manager and has assembled a team that is not only beyond competent, but they have no personality conflicts; several of them are friends. I relate it to a seasoned football or basketball team where there is very little effort wasted holding the hand so-to-speak of a team member, every one can independently complete their job with little micromanaging. Part of the reason she grew tired of the job before was that in order to save a few million dollars they forced out the long-term experience/seasoned workers and hired in newbies straight from college. How's that for stupid? This may provide a short-term boost in profits, so the CEO's get a nice bonus, but it harms the long-term viability of the company. I think they started started seeing the error of that and Cecilia's boss hired back not only Cecilia but another long-termer. So, let's hope she'll be able to hang on for 5 years or so.
I guess some recent news with my job can be classified as a new start. In an effort to streamline government spending our group, which is officially a NOAA (National Oceanic and Atmospheric Administration) division, is going to be absorbed or transfered to the US EPA. Before, the EPA basically hired us out from NOAA, but they had to pay NOAA not only our salary, but a large overhead. Their basically cutting out the middle man, which all of us certainly agree with. Many conservatives seem to really dislike the US EPA because they do oversee regulation on businesses, but I'll wear the EPA badge with honor as we move forward and protect the planet, a beautiful gift from God.
I'm slipping into politics it seems, so why not just dive in full bore. It is clear now that Obama will be the Democratic nominee for President of the United States. This week our current President used the Israeli parliament to launch a veiled attack on Obama. They are trying to now back down and say it was general attack on whoever disagrees with their foreign policy direction, but people close to the President acknowledged it was aimed at Obama before our President made the speech. Plus John McCain was quick to pounce on Obama after the speech leaving no doubt that it was aimed at Obama. It is despicable for the President to play domestic politics overseas. I've got to think that Obama's been holding back in his fight against Hillary because he did not want to be seen as an angry black man fighting a white woman because absolutely crushed, in my opinion, John McCain and George Bush. If you do not think about anything else, think about the fact that our intellegence says that Al Queda is as strong as at 911 and we've been fighting them for 6.5 years what will cost by some estimates 2 trillion dollars, sacrificed easily over 100 K lives including Iraqi civilians and our brave soldiers.
Here are some of his words if you can't watch the video:
You know, after almost eight years, I did not think I could be surprised about anything that George Bush says, but I was wrong. Yesterday, George Bush was before the Israeli parliament, the Knesset, to help commemorate the 60th anniversary of Israeli independence. That's a wonderful occasion and a time for celebration.
But instead of celebrating and offering some clear ideas about how to move the situation in the Middle East forward, the president did something that presidents don't do, and that is launch a political attack targeted toward the domestic market in front of a foreign delegation.
George Bush and John McCain have a lot to answer for. They've got to explain why we are now in our sixth year, entering our sixth year of war in Iraq.
We were supposed to be going over there for weapons of mass destruction that we never found. We were told that it was going to last a few months and cost a few billion dollars. We have now spent over $600 billion, thousands of lives lost, and we have not been made more safe.
They're going to have to explain the fact that Osama bin Laden is still at large and is sending out videotapes with impunity.
They need to answer for the fact that Al Qaida's leadership is stronger than ever because we took our eye off the ball in Afghanistan.
They've got to answer for the fact that Iran is the greatest strategic beneficiary of our invasion in Iraq. It made Iran stronger, George Bush's policies.
They're going to have to explain why Hamas now controls Gaza, Hamas that was strengthened because the United States insisted that we should have democratic elections in the Palestinian Authority.
They're going to have to explain why it is that Iran is able to fund Hezbollah and poses the greatest threat to America and Israel and the Middle East in a generation.
